Tuesday 5 February 2013

Formartine Buchan Way or Formartine Buchan Railway?



During the last week or so there have been reports in the local press which indicate that  moves are afoot within Aberdeenshire Council to request that North East Scotland Transport Partnership (NESTRANS) should carry out a feasibility study to consider reinstating the railway line along the Formartine Buchan Way.The chief aim of this proposal would be to reduce traffic congestion between Aberdeen, Ellon, Fraserburgh and Peterhead, councillors point to the success of the Borders-Edinburgh (rail) Link as setting a precedent for such a scheme. Whilst deploring the closure of the Line as a result of Dr Beeching's axe, and acknowledging the enormous environmental impact of the daily volume of traffic heading to and from  Aberdeen each day, Grey Granite considers that the possible benefits  of reinstating  a railway are limited, not least on account of various obstacles and the astronomical financial and environmental costs involved.
The Line follows an indirect route to Aberdeen, chosen to partly to serve the whims of the various landowners who either opposed the coming of the railway or welcomed it in the mid 19th century. 
.

Many bridges carrying roads over the Line have been removed completely so that the Line is intersected by the road, elsewhere as at Brucklay, above, and entering Peterhead replacement bridges are too low for trains to pass through them.


Section leading through housing developments towards the centre of Peterhead where the site of the former station   is occupied by Peterhead Academy
Here in Fraserburgh a section of the original railway line is now under a new road. In both Peterhead and Fraserburgh it is likely that a reinstated railway would have to terminate some distance from the town centre. Would people then make sufficient use of it to justify the enormous expense involved in reconstruction of stations and bridges, realigning roads and track laying? Would this be appropriate for handling freight moving in and out of the ports?
Having been destroyed by fire before being demolished all that remains of Fraserburgh Station is the engine shed seen below.The station yard and sidings have all been built over.




Logierieve, one of the many station buildings which has been turned into  a private house. Many houses and even factories and industrial units such as these at Mintlaw Station (below) have been built very close to the Line. This may be unacceptable if the railway were reinstated.


At the same time as the proposed reinstatement feasibility study was being discussed in the local press, 'Scotland on Sunday' (3.2.13, Wildlife Trust Want Hedge Fund to hit Eco Targets) reported that the Scottish Wildlife Trust campaigning for the establishment of a national network of hedgerows to enable biodiversity and climate change targets to be met. Such a network would in effect be  a wildlife corridor enabling species to move from one area of suitable habitat to another. The value of the Line in doing this cannot be overstated. In the treeless tracts of countryside under intensive agriculture  crossed by the Line, it forms a precious habitat for many birds in particular. Throughout the autumn and winter months flocks of finches and tits, amongst other species, forage on the seeds along the line. Badgers and smaller mammals, including hedgehogs whose numbers are declining rapidly,  find sanctuary along the  embankments. With reduced, although sadly not entirely absent, spraying with herbicides the line supports a diverse flora which in turn supports insects including butterflies and moths.

The Formartine Buchan Way is a well established and much used long distance path and cycle way, providing safe and easy access to the heart of the Aberdeenshire countryside. The closure of the railway line to passenger and then goods traffic almost half a century ago is frequently vilified as being shortsighted. Grey Granite's contention is that to now  reinstate the railway line, with all the associated financial and environmental costs,  would be equally shortsighted. 

3 comments:

  1. It wont happen, it is a total waste of money to even do this feasability study. I for one will be leading the protest against it if it ever looks as if it is going to get off the ground. In fact I did suggest that any railway they want should be alongside the main roads, e.g. the new one/widening for this energetica corridor. They might even be daft enough to follow Edinburgh and get trams.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The route from Aberdeen to Peterhead via Maud is indirect and longer than road, however the route from Aberdeen to Fraserburgh (and intermediate stations) is fairly direct. Even reinstating Aberdeen - Kittybrewster - Dyce (possibly a slight deviation for Airport) - Newmachar - (Udny?) - Ellon would be beneficial, especially if there were park and ride facilities. If that turns out to be successful, then extending further North becomes more viable.

    There's also the route of the former Boddam Branch from Ellon, which has been built over in places but could be brought back into use with a new junction north of Ellon, rejoining the line at Balmacassie. Would need final extension to Peterhead from Boddam (though the terminus of the old Prison railway from Boddam - Peterhead isn't far away...)

    People who say the route is infeasible don't sit for 90 minutes queueing for the Bridge of Don daily. There's plenty of scope for reopening, using a mixture of old and new routes, if the will is there.

    Properties in the way of a route, be it rail or road are not a problem, that's what CPOs are for. The partial reopening of the Borders route required the demolition of many properties too.

    However the costs will be high, as Dyce - Aberdeen will need to be redoubled, (and possibly platform 8 reinstated). But this is on the cards anyway as part of improvements to services to Inverurie and further North, and the land is still there even though the line is singled (silliest decision ever). If this is all looked at sensibly, and treated as one coherent plan for the long term future of the North East, it could be very successful and enable lots of people to commute without cars.

    Even if in 50 years time we have environmentally friendly cars, the road capacity isn't there for ever increasing numbers of them. We can't just sit back and ignore the problem for ever.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for taking the time to open up the debate. What must be avoided is a repeat of Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route debacle.

      Delete